Skip to main content
Submitted by Xenoveritas on Wed, 10/29/2008 - 04:36

I thought that I'd add some more results just for comparison purposes. All of these tests were done on an even older computer: an AMD Athlon 64 3400+ running openSUSE 11.0 or 11.1 beta3. Here are my results:

RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
Opera 9.61, openSUSE 11.0: 9947.2ms +/- 11.9%
Konqueror 3.5.9, openSUSE 11.0: 42003.8ms +/- 2.6%
Konqueror 4.1.2, openSUSE 11.1 beta3: 12253.6ms +/- 1.3%
Firefox 3.0.3, openSUSE 11.0: 5542.6ms +/- 13.4%
Firefox 3.0.3, openSUSE 11.1 beta3: 9294.6ms +/- 4.5%


    Opera not yet installed on openSUSE 11.1 beta3
    string-validate-input caused warning about KHTML freeze on Konqueror 3.5.9. Manual continuation was required on each pass for the test to complete.

Even in the worst case (where I had to manually click a button to get the test to continue) it still more than twice as fast as a PS/3.

Wed, 10/29/2008 - 18:27 Permalink

Sony never claimed that their JavaScript performance was better than Opera or Firefox, and explicitly said it wasn't up to WebKit standards.

On the other hand, both the Wii and the iPod Touch (!!) have better results on the benchmark than the PS3 browser! And both of them were able to complete all benchmarks without crashing!

I'll be posting full results eventually.

Thu, 10/30/2008 - 17:40 Permalink

According to Masaki Takase, the PS3's JavaScript performance beats that of IE7's.

Really? That sounds like something that's testable! Cue SunSpider!

Well, actually, no. Because the PS3 browser can't handle all the SunSpider tests. I had to remove three of them to get it to complete. Results in the full article.

To compare, I ran IE7 under Windows XP on an Intel Core Duo T2600 (2.16GHz) - a PC that was bought before the PS3 was actually released. So this should be a relatively "fair" comparison, as both pieces of hardware date to about the same time.

The version of IE7 is fully patched. Keep in mind that the total score for the IE7 build is biased against it, because it includes tests the PS3 skipped, raising its total time by over 12 seconds spent running tests the PS3 browser simply couldn't handle.

Test Avg. Time Conf. Int Avg. Time Conf. Int
Total 98001.0ms ±0.1% 35491.8ms ±2.0%
3d 10698.6ms ±0.5% 1500.4ms ±4.7%
cube 2482.4ms ±0.7% 425.2ms ±13.9%
morph 5386.0ms ±0.8% 500.0ms ±9.1%
raytrace 2830.2ms ±0.7% 575.2ms ±7.3%
access 13422.0ms ±0.9% 2337.0ms ±3.0%
binary-trees 1851.0ms ±1.0% 524.8ms ±3.3%
fannkuch 7822.6ms ±1.0% 915.6ms ±6.1%
nbody 1662.2ms ±1.9% 431.0ms ±11.0%
nsieve 2086.2ms ±2.3% 465.6ms ±1.9%
bitops 16259.0ms ±0.4% 2022.8ms ±2.6%
3bit-bits-in-byte 4377.2ms ±0.4% 472.0ms ±10.3%
bits-in-byte 5297.4ms ±0.5% 475.2ms ±11.0%
bitwise-and Failed (JavaScript error) 578.4ms ±7.5%
nsieve-bits 6584.4ms ±0.7% 497.2ms ±8.5%
controlflow No tests completed 547.0ms ±9.1%
recursive CRASHED 547.0ms ±9.1%
crypto 10504.6ms ±1.2% 1259.2ms ±3.6%
aes 2996.6ms ±0.5% 475.2ms ±4.7%
md5 4029.4ms ±3.4% 387.4ms ±11.4%
sha1 3478.6ms ±0.3% 396.6ms ±4.3%
date 5178.2ms ±0.8% 1531.4ms ±2.9%
format-tofte 2091.6ms ±0.6% 1044.0ms ±3.4%
format-xparb 3086.6ms ±1.1% 487.4ms ±7.6%
math 17374.4ms ±0.5% 1362.4ms ±4.7%
cordic 5594.0ms ±0.4% 559.4ms ±9.0%
partial-sums 9235.6ms ±0.7% 365.6ms ±14.4%
spectral-norm 2544.8ms ±1.2% 437.4ms ±10.4%
regexp 3083.8ms ±1.4% 481.2ms ±10.1%
dna 3083.8ms ±1.4% 481.2ms ±10.1%
string 21480.4ms ±0.5% 24450.4ms ±3.3%
base64 Failed (JavaScript error) 11528.2ms ±6.1%
fasta 6818.4ms ±1.3% 550.2ms ±7.3%
tagcloud 4058.8ms ±1.1% 3481.4ms ±2.1%
unpack-code 7951.6ms ±0.6% 534.2ms ±3.1%
validate-input 2651.6ms ±2.0% 8356.4ms ±1.1%

Oh yeah. Clearly a better performer than IE7.